#Section 13(1)(d) PC Act

The Bombay High Court has ruled that under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, a public servant commits an offence merely by demanding or accepting a bribe-even if they lack the official authority to perform the requested act. This clarifies that the law targets the corrupt act itself, not the outcome, strengthening accountability across all levels of public service.

Kerala High Court reaffirms that conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act requires conclusive proof of both demand and acceptance of bribes, not merely circumstantial evidence. The ruling clarifies that corroboration by a decoy witness is not essential if the prosecution's evidence meets the beyond-reasonable-doubt standard, impacting corruption trials involving public servants.