Topic

Road Accident Cases

4 articlesLatest May 2026
Section 528 BNS | Compromise in Non-Heinous Road Accident Offences Justifies FIR Quashing When Prosecution Serves No Public Interest: HP HC
Case Law Analysis
|Himachal Pradesh High Court

Section 528 BNS | Compromise in Non-Heinous Road Accident Offences Justifies FIR Quashing When Prosecution Serves No Public Interest: HP HC

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has ruled that where parties to a non-heinous road accident case under IPC Sections 279, 337, and 338 reach a voluntary compromise, the FIR may be quashed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita if continuing prosecution offers no discernible public benefit. This sets a clear precedent for courts to prioritize restorative justice over mechanical prosecution in low-severity traffic offences, benefiting accused persons and reducing judicial backlog.

Section 125(a)/281 BNS | Compromise in Minor Road Accident Cases Justifies FIR Quashing Under Inherent Powers : Delhi HC
Case Law Analysis
|Delhi High Court

Section 125(a)/281 BNS | Compromise in Minor Road Accident Cases Justifies FIR Quashing Under Inherent Powers : Delhi HC

Delhi High Court quashes FIR under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for minor road accidents where parties reach a compromise and compensation is paid, holding that continued prosecution serves no public purpose for simple injuries. The ruling reinforces the court's inherent powers to prevent abuse of process in compoundable offences with civil flavours.