Topic

Repeal of Statute

2 articlesLatest May 2026
ULC Act Repeal | Vesting Without Physical Possession Abates Proceedings; Mere Section 10(3) Notification Insufficient for State Ownership : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

ULC Act Repeal | Vesting Without Physical Possession Abates Proceedings; Mere Section 10(3) Notification Insufficient for State Ownership : Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has ruled that under the ULC Act repeal, land declared surplus but never taken into physical possession by the State reverts automatically to the original owner. A notification under Section 10(3) alone, without actual possession or control, cannot sustain State ownership post-repeal, rendering all pending proceedings abated. This clarifies a critical loophole affecting thousands of landowners whose properties were notified but never acquired.