Topic

Renewable Energy

4 articlesLatest May 2026
Accrued Rights Under Solar Policy 2019 | Rajasthan HC Bars Retrospective Withdrawal of Electricity Duty Exemption for Commissioned Projects
Case Law Analysis
|Rajasthan High Court

Accrued Rights Under Solar Policy 2019 | Rajasthan HC Bars Retrospective Withdrawal of Electricity Duty Exemption for Commissioned Projects

Rajasthan High Court rules that rights accrued under the Solar Policy 2019, including electricity duty exemptions, cannot be retrospectively revoked for projects already commissioned. The judgment reinforces the enforceability of policy incentives against arbitrary state amendments, impacting renewable energy investors and public-private partnerships.

Section 4 Competition Act | No Prima Facie Abuse of Dominance Where Tender Design Allows Multiple Bidders & Market Definition Excludes Non-Solar Sources : CCI
Competition Law
|Competition Commission of India

Section 4 Competition Act | No Prima Facie Abuse of Dominance Where Tender Design Allows Multiple Bidders & Market Definition Excludes Non-Solar Sources : CCI

The Competition Commission of India found that the solar power bidding process did not constitute abuse of dominance because the tender design permitted open participation, the relevant market was properly defined to exclude non-solar energy sources, and no anti-competitive conduct was demonstrated by Adani or SECI. This sets a critical precedent for renewable energy procurement, affirming that market structure and transparent bidding protocols can preclude dominance concerns even with major players.

Article 226 | Police Duty to Proactively Protect Lawful Infrastructure Projects from Unlawful Obstruction : Madras HC
Case Law Analysis
|Madras High Court

Article 226 | Police Duty to Proactively Protect Lawful Infrastructure Projects from Unlawful Obstruction : Madras HC

Madras High Court dismisses a writ petition after police confirm restoration of order at a 100 MW solar project, reinforcing that state authorities must proactively safeguard lawful infrastructure from unlawful disruptions. The ruling clarifies that police protection is not merely reactive but a mandatory duty under constitutional writ jurisdiction.