Topic

religious endowments

4 articlesLatest 2 weeks ago
Gift of Temple Inam Land Void Under Section 41(1) TN HRCE Act | Enhanced Lease Payment Directed : SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Gift of Temple Inam Land Void Under Section 41(1) TN HRCE Act | Enhanced Lease Payment Directed : SC

The Supreme Court held that a gift of temple inam land by a temporary trustee is void under Section 41(1) of the TN HRCE Act, 1959 because the Act permits no sanction for such gifts. It directed the government to pay enhanced lease rent of ₹31,000 per month from March 8, 2019, with arrears payable in three months and ₹1 lakh costs within eight weeks.

Section 83(2) Andhra Pradesh Endowments Act | Withdrawal of Proceedings Under Repealed Provisions Impermissible Without Vested Rights Impact : AP HC
Case Law Analysis
|Andhra Pradesh High Court

Section 83(2) Andhra Pradesh Endowments Act | Withdrawal of Proceedings Under Repealed Provisions Impermissible Without Vested Rights Impact : AP HC

The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that proceedings cannot be withdrawn under repealed provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Endowments Act merely to invoke amended provisions, unless no vested rights are affected. The Court also affirmed the authority of a Founder Family Member to issue eviction notices for exempted institutions, reinforcing statutory compliance in religious endowment disputes.

Article 14 & Hereditary Temple Rights | Non-Contagious Vitiligo Cannot Disqualify Sannidhi Paricharaka Duties : Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Article 14 & Hereditary Temple Rights | Non-Contagious Vitiligo Cannot Disqualify Sannidhi Paricharaka Duties : Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court rules that hereditary temple servants (Sannidhi Paricharaka) cannot be barred from performing religious duties due to non-contagious vitiligo, reinforcing constitutional equality under Article 14. The court permits regulated delegation of duties while prohibiting discrimination based on medical conditions unrelated to ritual competence.

Locus Standi Under Andhra Pradesh Endowments Act | Stranger Cannot Seek Mandamus for Temple Land Encroachment Removal: AP HC
Case Law Analysis
|Andhra Pradesh High Court

Locus Standi Under Andhra Pradesh Endowments Act | Stranger Cannot Seek Mandamus for Temple Land Encroachment Removal: AP HC

The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that a third-party petitioner lacks locus standi to seek a writ of mandamus for removal of encroachments on temple land under the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987. The court directed authorities to protect the temple properties while dismissing the petition.