Topic

rape allegations

Rape allegations in Indian law involve criminal charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, particularly Section 69, where consent, promise of marriage, and prior relationships are critical factors in determining guilt.

8 articlesLatest July 2026
No Evidence of Forced Conversion or Rape | Bail Granted Under UP Conversion Act & BNS: Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

No Evidence of Forced Conversion or Rape | Bail Granted Under UP Conversion Act & BNS: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court granted bail to an accused under the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion Act and BNS, finding no credible evidence of religious conversion or sexual assault. The ruling reinforces that mere change of name on Aadhaar, without corroborative proof of coercion or inducement, cannot sustain charges under the Act - protecting consensual adult relationships from weaponized prosecution.

BNS Section 69 | False Promise of Marriage Defence Invalid If Victim Was Already Married: Allahabad HC Grants Bail
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

BNS Section 69 | False Promise of Marriage Defence Invalid If Victim Was Already Married: Allahabad HC Grants Bail

Allahabad High Court ruled that allegations of rape under false promise of marriage cannot stand if the victim was already married at the time of the alleged incident. The court granted bail, emphasizing the absence of a prima facie case under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, where the victim’s marital status negates the claim of deception.

Section 351(1) BNSS + Medico-Legal Absence of Injury | Bail Granted in Rape Case Where Viral Video Claim Unsubstantiated : Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

Section 351(1) BNSS + Medico-Legal Absence of Injury | Bail Granted in Rape Case Where Viral Video Claim Unsubstantiated : Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court granted bail to a 66-year-old accused in a rape case after finding no physical evidence of assault and no corroboration of the viral video allegation, reinforcing that absence of medical injury and unproven digital claims undermine the prima facie case under BNSS. This sets a critical precedent for bail in sexual offence cases where forensic evidence is nil and digital allegations remain unverified.

BNS Section 69 | Consensual Relationship Without Promise of Marriage Does Not Constitute Rape: Patna HC Grants Anticipatory Bail
Case Law Analysis
|Patna High Court

BNS Section 69 | Consensual Relationship Without Promise of Marriage Does Not Constitute Rape: Patna HC Grants Anticipatory Bail

Patna High Court rules that consensual sexual relations without a promise of marriage do not attract rape charges under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), even if followed by pregnancy and abortion allegations. The court granted anticipatory bail, emphasizing the absence of corroborative evidence to substantiate coercion or deceit.

Section 528 BNSS | Prior Consensual Relationship Does Not Justify FIR Quashing in Rape & Blackmail Cases : MP HC Indore
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Section 528 BNSS | Prior Consensual Relationship Does Not Justify FIR Quashing in Rape & Blackmail Cases : MP HC Indore

MP High Court rejects FIR quashing petition where the accused exploited a prior relationship to coerce physical relations and extort ₹10 lakhs, holding that consent in past affairs does not negate criminal liability for rape and blackmail. The ruling reinforces that coercion and financial exploitation remain actionable offences regardless of prior intimacy.

Section 482 CrPC | Prima Facie Rape + Blackmail Allegations Warrant Trial, Not Quashing : Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

Section 482 CrPC | Prima Facie Rape + Blackmail Allegations Warrant Trial, Not Quashing : Allahabad HC

Allahabad High Court rules that allegations of rape coupled with blackmail, supported by prima facie evidence like indecent material, cannot be quashed under Section 482 CrPC. The court emphasized that consensual relationship claims or delayed FIRs do not negate the need for trial where serious offences are alleged, impacting how lower courts assess quashing petitions in similar cases.