Topic

prosecution failure

2 articlesLatest May 2026
NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(B) | Unbroken Chain of Custody Mandatory for Conviction; Procedural Lapses Lead to Acquittal : Chhattisgarh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Chhattisgarh High Court

NDPS Act Section 20(b)(ii)(B) | Unbroken Chain of Custody Mandatory for Conviction; Procedural Lapses Lead to Acquittal : Chhattisgarh HC

Chhattisgarh High Court acquitted the accused in an NDPS case, ruling that broken chain of custody and failure to prove exclusive possession invalidate prosecution evidence. The judgment underscores strict procedural compliance as a prerequisite for conviction under the NDPS Act, impacting drug-related prosecutions nationwide.

Section 50 NDPS Act | Non-Compliance Vitiates Search and Seizure: Chhattisgarh HC Upholds Acquittal Due to Procedural Lapses
Case Law Analysis
|Chhattisgarh High Court

Section 50 NDPS Act | Non-Compliance Vitiates Search and Seizure: Chhattisgarh HC Upholds Acquittal Due to Procedural Lapses

Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that failure to comply with Section 50 of the NDPS Act-requiring a search before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer-fatally undermines the prosecution's case, even if the accused consents to a police search. The judgment reinforces that procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act are mandatory, not directory, and their breach warrants acquittal.