Topic

Prosecution Evidence

2 articlesLatest May 2026
Injured Eyewitness Testimony Alone Sufficient for Conviction Under IPC | Corroboration Not Mandatory If Testimony Inspires Confidence : Jharkhand HC
Case Law Analysis
|Jharkhand High Court

Injured Eyewitness Testimony Alone Sufficient for Conviction Under IPC | Corroboration Not Mandatory If Testimony Inspires Confidence : Jharkhand HC

Jharkhand High Court rules that the sole testimony of an injured eyewitness can sustain a conviction under the Indian Penal Code, provided the testimony is credible and medical evidence supports it. This reinforces the principle that corroboration is not mandatory when the core evidence is trustworthy, impacting criminal prosecutions relying on ocular evidence.

Section 304 IPC | Bail Granted Due to Material Contradictions in Prosecution Evidence and Prolonged Pre-Trial Custody: MP HC
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Section 304 IPC | Bail Granted Due to Material Contradictions in Prosecution Evidence and Prolonged Pre-Trial Custody: MP HC

Madhya Pradesh High Court suspends a 10-year sentence under Section 304 IPC, emphasizing material contradictions in prosecution witness depositions and 22 months of pre-trial custody as grounds for bail. The ruling underscores the court's discretion to grant bail pending appeal where evidence reliability is seriously doubted, even in serious offences.