Topic

Personal Expenses Deduction

4 articlesLatest July 2026
Motor Vehicles Act | Bombay HC Sets Rs. 30,000 Notional Income Benchmark & Rs. 48,000 Consortium Per Dependent in Fatal Accident Claims
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Motor Vehicles Act | Bombay HC Sets Rs. 30,000 Notional Income Benchmark & Rs. 48,000 Consortium Per Dependent in Fatal Accident Claims

Bombay High Court revises compensation norms in fatal motor accident cases, establishing Rs. 30,000 as notional annual income for deceased graduates assisting in family businesses and awarding Rs. 48,000 consortium per dependent. The ruling reduces personal expense deduction to 1/2 for bachelors with unmarried siblings, impacting future claims under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Section 166 MV Act | Non-Impleadment of Driver Not Fatal to Motor Accident Claims; Fair Compensation Mandatory : Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

Section 166 MV Act | Non-Impleadment of Driver Not Fatal to Motor Accident Claims; Fair Compensation Mandatory : Allahabad HC

Allahabad High Court holds that failure to implead the driver in motor accident claims does not invalidate the claim, emphasizing courts' duty to award just compensation regardless of procedural objections. The ruling reinforces that tribunals must apply the correct multiplier and dependency ratio, even in the absence of cross-objections, to ensure fair compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Motor Accident Compensation | Deduction for Personal Expenses Must Be Proportionate to Dependents, Not Fixed at 1/3 : Chhattisgarh HC Rejects Sarla Verma’s Rigid Formula
Case Law Analysis
|Chhattisgarh High Court

Motor Accident Compensation | Deduction for Personal Expenses Must Be Proportionate to Dependents, Not Fixed at 1/3 : Chhattisgarh HC Rejects Sarla Verma’s Rigid Formula

The Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that deductions for personal expenses in motor accident compensation must reflect the actual number of dependents, rejecting the insurer’s plea for a fixed one-third deduction under the Sarla Verma principle. The court held that a one-fourth deduction was justified where six dependents relied on the deceased’s income, emphasizing a case-specific approach over a rigid formula.