Topic

Negligence Liability

2 articlesLatest September 2026
Direct causal nexus essential for contractor liability under Sec 106(1) BNS | Death of employee case : Calcutta HC
|Calcutta High Court

Direct causal nexus essential for contractor liability under Sec 106(1) BNS | Death of employee case : Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court set aside the FIR, ruling that Section 106(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita demands a direct causal link between the accused’s act and the victim’s death. A contractor’s failure to provide safety equipment alone, without proof that the omission caused the fatality, does not attract criminal liability. The decision narrows the reach of criminal negligence provisions for employers and contractors across India.

Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal's Compensation Award Upheld Despite APSRTC's Challenge on Quantum Proof: Andhra Pradesh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Andhra Pradesh High Court

Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal's Compensation Award Upheld Despite APSRTC's Challenge on Quantum Proof: Andhra Pradesh HC

The Andhra Pradesh High Court affirmed a Rs. 15.63 lakh compensation award for a medical aspirant injured in a road accident, emphasizing that tribunals' quantum awards under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act cannot be overturned without substantive evidence of negligence or error. The ruling reinforces the burden of proof on appellants challenging compensation amounts, impacting future motor accident claims and appeals.