Topic

Natural justice in consumer disputes

2 articlesLatest May 2026
Section 38 Consumer Protection Act | District Commission Cannot Issue Evidence Directions at Preliminary Stage Without Hearing : Punjab SCDRC
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Section 38 Consumer Protection Act | District Commission Cannot Issue Evidence Directions at Preliminary Stage Without Hearing : Punjab SCDRC

Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission rules that issuing evidence directions at the preliminary stage-without affording parties an opportunity to be heard-violates natural justice principles under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The decision reinforces procedural safeguards for complainants and opposite parties, ensuring fair adjudication before evidence is directed.

Section 38(3)(c) Consumer Protection Act 1986 | Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Violates Natural Justice : Rajasthan HC
Case Law Analysis
|Rajasthan High Court

Section 38(3)(c) Consumer Protection Act 1986 | Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Violates Natural Justice : Rajasthan HC

Rajasthan High Court holds that Consumer Commissions cannot dismiss complaints under Section 38(3)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 without adjudicating merits, as it violates principles of natural justice. The ruling mandates that procedural defaults cannot override substantive rights, ensuring complainants get a fair hearing.