Topic
Bombay High Court set aside a punishment order under Regulation 90 of MSEDCL, ruling that quashing the order reinstates the employee’s right to full gratuity and leave encashment. The court directed payment within six weeks of claim submission, emphasizing employer obligations under service law.
Bombay High Court quashed MSEDCL’s punishment order, ruling that documentary evidence alone is insufficient in departmental enquiries without examining witnesses or allowing cross-examination. The judgment reinforces that natural justice principles require oral proof for disciplinary actions, impacting service law proceedings across public sector employment.
The Bombay High Court has ruled that MSEDCL must pay Rs. 4 lakh compensation under its administrative circulars to the widow of a deceased contractor worker killed in an electrocution, clarifying that 'outsider' status under the policy extends to workers of third-party contractors engaged by the utility. This sets a critical precedent for humanitarian relief obligations of public utilities beyond statutory employer liability, impacting thousands of contract workers across Maharashtra’s power sector.
Bombay High Court initiates suo motu PIL to monitor quality of underground cabling restoration work in Nagpur, establishing judicial oversight for public infrastructure projects.