Topic

mediclaim policy

3 articlesLatest July 2026
Intravitreal Injections Not Subject to Hospitalization Requirement Under Mediclaim | Medical Necessity Overrides Policy Terms : M.P. State Consumer Commission
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Intravitreal Injections Not Subject to Hospitalization Requirement Under Mediclaim | Medical Necessity Overrides Policy Terms : M.P. State Consumer Commission

The M.P. State Consumer Commission ruled that insurers cannot deny claims for intravitreal injections like Lucentis solely because they are administered as outpatient procedures, if certified by a medical professional as medically necessary. This sets a critical precedent for policyholders undergoing chronic eye treatments, ensuring coverage aligns with clinical reality rather than arbitrary hospitalization clauses.

Mediclaim Reimbursements Not Deductible from MACT Awards | Statutory Compensation Independent of Contractual Insurance Benefits : SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Mediclaim Reimbursements Not Deductible from MACT Awards | Statutory Compensation Independent of Contractual Insurance Benefits : SC

The Supreme Court has ruled that amounts received under a Mediclaim policy are contractual benefits and cannot be offset against statutory compensation awarded by a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. This clarifies that double recovery principles do not apply, ensuring accident victims can retain both insurance payouts and tribunal-awarded damages without reduction.