Topic

medical necessity

3 articlesLatest July 2026
Intravitreal Injections Not Subject to Hospitalization Requirement Under Mediclaim | Medical Necessity Overrides Policy Terms : M.P. State Consumer Commission
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Intravitreal Injections Not Subject to Hospitalization Requirement Under Mediclaim | Medical Necessity Overrides Policy Terms : M.P. State Consumer Commission

The M.P. State Consumer Commission ruled that insurers cannot deny claims for intravitreal injections like Lucentis solely because they are administered as outpatient procedures, if certified by a medical professional as medically necessary. This sets a critical precedent for policyholders undergoing chronic eye treatments, ensuring coverage aligns with clinical reality rather than arbitrary hospitalization clauses.

Article 21 | Interim Bail Granted for Non-Urgent Surgical Implant Removal Due to Persistent Pain: Rajasthan HC
Case Law Analysis
|Rajasthan High Court

Article 21 | Interim Bail Granted for Non-Urgent Surgical Implant Removal Due to Persistent Pain: Rajasthan HC

The Rajasthan High Court has ruled that persistent physical pain from surgically implanted medical devices, even when removal is not immediately life-threatening, constitutes a violation of the right to bodily integrity under Article 21. This sets a precedent for granting interim bail in cases where prolonged suffering in custody undermines human dignity, expanding the scope of medical necessity beyond emergency conditions.