Topic

Lata Singh case

2 articlesLatest June 2026
No Automatic Right to Police Protection for Choice Marriages | Absence of Threat Perception Bars Mandamus : Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

No Automatic Right to Police Protection for Choice Marriages | Absence of Threat Perception Bars Mandamus : Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that couples in consensual marriages cannot demand police protection as a legal right without concrete evidence of imminent threat. This clarifies that judicial intervention is not a substitute for societal resilience - security is available only when a real danger is established, not merely due to familial disapproval or social stigma.

Article 21 | Police Protection Mandatory for Inter-Caste Couples Facing Family Threats: MP HC Gwalior Bench Invokes Lata Singh & Shakti Vahini Precedents
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Article 21 | Police Protection Mandatory for Inter-Caste Couples Facing Family Threats: MP HC Gwalior Bench Invokes Lata Singh & Shakti Vahini Precedents

The Madhya Pradesh High Court directed police to verify threats and provide protection to an inter-caste couple facing harassment, reaffirming the constitutional right to marry freely under Article 21. The ruling mandates state intervention to safeguard life and liberty, relying on Supreme Court judgments in Lata Singh and Shakti Vahini cases.