#Judicial Stay

NCLAT rules that an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) is entitled only to proportional fees for duties performed during a stay on Committee of Creditors (CoC) constitution, rejecting claims for full statutory remuneration. The ruling clarifies that fee entitlement under IBC is contingent on actual functions discharged, not mere appointment duration.

ITAT Mumbai ruled that Assessing Officers must stay proceedings and comply with interim High Court directions under Section 10(23C)(via) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal set aside an assessment order for ignoring judicial stay, reinforcing that interim orders bind tax authorities until final disposal of writ petitions, ensuring natural justice for charitable trusts.

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules that administrative transfers bypassing a judicial stay due to staff unrest or political pressure violate natural justice. The court mandates fair, independent inquiries with notice to the officer, reinforcing procedural safeguards in public employment.

Madhya Pradesh High Court reaffirms that interim orders prohibit state authorities from taking coercive action pending hearing, even against heritage structures.