Topic

judicial ethics

2 articlesLatest September 2026
Section 114 Customs Act penalty set aside; AI-generated fake citations barred - SC adopts zero-tolerance for unverified AI material : SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Section 114 Customs Act penalty set aside; AI-generated fake citations barred - SC adopts zero-tolerance for unverified AI material : SC

The Supreme Court quashed a Rs 425 crore Section 114 Customs Act penalty after finding the order relied on AI-generated citations that were non-existent or mis-quoted. It imposed a zero-tolerance rule for unverified AI material, rendering such decisions void and urging verification by customs officials and litigants.

State Cannot Disown Counsel's Judicial Admissions via Review Petition | Jharkhand HC Imposes Personal Costs for Abuse of Process : JHHC
Case Law Analysis
|Jharkhand High Court

State Cannot Disown Counsel's Judicial Admissions via Review Petition | Jharkhand HC Imposes Personal Costs for Abuse of Process : JHHC

The Jharkhand High Court has ruled that state entities cannot file review petitions solely to repudiate statements made by their own counsel in court, calling it a gross abuse of process. It imposed Rs. 50,000 personal costs on officials, reinforcing that judicial admissions bind the state and cannot be retreated from through procedural manipulation. This sets a critical precedent for accountability in public litigation and deters tactical litigation gamesmanship by government bodies.