Topic

interlocutory application

3 articlesLatest September 2026
Spoliation of Evidence | Adverse Inference Cannot Be Granted via Interlocutory Application Mid-Trial : West Bengal SCDRC
Case Law Analysis

Spoliation of Evidence | Adverse Inference Cannot Be Granted via Interlocutory Application Mid-Trial : West Bengal SCDRC

West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission rules that allegations of document spoliation must be adjudicated only at the final hearing, not through interlocutory applications, to uphold principles of natural justice. The decision reinforces that adverse inference cannot be drawn prematurely, ensuring fair contestation for all parties in consumer complaints.

Section 39 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam | Trial Court Must Number and Decide Handwriting Comparison Applications When Signature Denial Is Contested, Not Admitted : Andhra Pradesh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Andhra Pradesh High Court

Section 39 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam | Trial Court Must Number and Decide Handwriting Comparison Applications When Signature Denial Is Contested, Not Admitted : Andhra Pradesh HC

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has ruled that trial courts cannot dismiss interlocutory applications for handwriting comparison merely because the signature denial is disputed - they must formally number and adjudicate such applications when the denial is plausible and not admitted in the written statement. This reinforces natural justice in evidence proceedings and prevents procedural evasion by opposing parties in contract disputes.