#Injunctions

The Himachal Pradesh High Court held that contempt proceedings under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC demand rigorous evidence of willful disobedience, not just technical breach of court orders. The ruling reinforces the penal nature of contempt and limits supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, impacting property disputes and injunction enforcement.

Madhya Pradesh High Court rules that plaintiffs seeking temporary injunctions under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC need not disclose prior agreements not forming the basis of the suit.