#Government Tenders

Karnataka High Court ruled that requiring experience in both entry and parking fee collection under a tender is arbitrary and violates Article 14, though it upheld a three-year experience requirement as a valid policy decision. The judgment underscores that while courts defer to administrative discretion, unreasonable or discriminatory tender conditions will be struck down.

Karnataka High Court ruled that an unreasonably high tender qualification threshold (₹60 crore) violates Article 14 by excluding capable bidders. The state's subsequent reduction to ₹29 crore sets a precedent for proportionality in public procurement, ensuring fair competition and constitutional compliance.

Telangana High Court ruled that reducing the estimated contract value from ₹10 crores to ₹5 crores and EMD from ₹25 lakhs to ₹12.5 lakhs in a tender schedule was arbitrary and unconstitutional, directing acceptance of petitioners' bids pending final disposal. The judgment reinforces judicial scrutiny over public procurement processes to prevent exclusionary practices.