Topic

Government Employee

4 articlesLatest July 2026
Compulsory Retirement Not Reviewable Without Mala Fides, Arbitrariness or Insufficient Evidence | Service Discipline : Tripura HC
Case Law Analysis
|Tripura High Court

Compulsory Retirement Not Reviewable Without Mala Fides, Arbitrariness or Insufficient Evidence | Service Discipline : Tripura HC

The Tripura High Court ruled that a disciplinary compulsory retirement can be challenged only on grounds of mala fides, arbitrariness or insufficient evidence, and that a prior criminal acquittal does not invalidate the retirement order. This narrows judicial review of service-discipline actions, affecting government employees facing forced retirement.

Emergency treatment at non-empaneled hospital is reimbursable under CGHS | Haryana pensioner claim : HC (Punjab & Haryana)
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Emergency treatment at non-empaneled hospital is reimbursable under CGHS | Haryana pensioner claim : HC (Punjab & Haryana)

The Punjab & Haryana HC ordered Rs 72,500 plus interest for a pensioner’s emergency surgery at a non-empaneled hospital, holding it is reimbursable under the Central Government Health Scheme. The ruling confirms that an emergency certificate alone triggers CGHS liability, speeding up claim disposal for government staff and retirees.