#Extremist Activities

The Supreme Court ruled that conviction under the Arms Act requires proof of 'conscious possession'-mere recovery of weapons from premises is insufficient. The judgment underscores the necessity of establishing dominion and knowledge over seized arms, impacting prosecutions under extremist-related offenses.

The Supreme Court reiterated that conviction under the Arms Act demands proof of 'conscious possession'-mere recovery of weapons without evidence of dominion or knowledge is insufficient. The ruling sets a critical precedent for extremist-related prosecutions, emphasizing the prosecution's burden to establish active control over seized arms.