Topic

ex parte award

5 articlesLatest June 2026
Section 69 Kerala Co-operative Societies Act | Ex Parte Award Challenges Must Be Decided Within Two Months to Uphold Natural Justice: Kerala HC
Case Law Analysis
|Kerala High Court

Section 69 Kerala Co-operative Societies Act | Ex Parte Award Challenges Must Be Decided Within Two Months to Uphold Natural Justice: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has mandated that Special Sale Officers must decide applications to set aside ex parte awards under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act within two months, ensuring timely redressal and preventing indefinite legal limbo for guarantors. This ruling reinforces natural justice in cooperative dispute resolution and binds all arbitral officers under the Act to enforce procedural deadlines.

Ex-Parte Participation Doesn't Validate Patently Illegal Awards | Section 34(2)(b)(ii), Arbitration & Conciliation Act | Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Ex-Parte Participation Doesn't Validate Patently Illegal Awards | Section 34(2)(b)(ii), Arbitration & Conciliation Act | Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court set aside ₹8.51 lakh of an arbitral award because the arbitrator awarded speculative damages without documentary support, even though the respondent participated ex-parte. This reinforces that ex-parte proceedings cannot cure fundamental flaws in arbitral reasoning - awards must still meet the threshold of legality under public policy, not just procedural compliance.

Employee's Compensation Act | Contractual Workers Entitled to Compensation if Employment Nexus Proven, Even Without Formal Appointment Docs: Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Employee's Compensation Act | Contractual Workers Entitled to Compensation if Employment Nexus Proven, Even Without Formal Appointment Docs: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court affirmed that contractual workers killed in work-related accidents are entitled to compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, even in the absence of formal appointment letters or salary records, if the employment nexus is established through circumstantial evidence. This ruling expands employer liability and protects vulnerable informal workers by prioritizing factual employment over documentary formalities.