Topic

Employee termination

3 articlesLatest June 2026
MEPS Act Section 9 | Oral Termination Without Inquiry Violates Deemed Permanency, Mandates Reinstatement with Full Backwages : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

MEPS Act Section 9 | Oral Termination Without Inquiry Violates Deemed Permanency, Mandates Reinstatement with Full Backwages : Bombay HC

Bombay High Court rules that oral termination of an employee with over 10 years of continuous service under the MEPS Act, without notice or inquiry, is illegal. The court affirmed deemed permanency, ordering reinstatement with full backwages and 9% interest, setting a precedent for procedural compliance in private school employment disputes.

Section 91 MCS Act | Co-operative Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over Service Disputes of Co-operative Bank Employees : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Section 91 MCS Act | Co-operative Courts Lack Jurisdiction Over Service Disputes of Co-operative Bank Employees : Bombay HC

Bombay High Court rules that service disputes involving employees of co-operative banks fall outside the purview of Co-operative Courts under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The judgment clarifies that such disputes must be adjudicated by civil courts, impacting employment litigation for co-operative bank employees.

MEPS Act Excludes Primary Ashram Schools from 'Private School' Definition | Bombay HC Denies School Tribunal Jurisdiction to Employees
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

MEPS Act Excludes Primary Ashram Schools from 'Private School' Definition | Bombay HC Denies School Tribunal Jurisdiction to Employees

Bombay High Court rules that Primary Ashram Schools do not fall under the definition of 'private schools' under the MEPS Act, thereby excluding their employees from invoking the School Tribunal's jurisdiction. The decision underscores the statutory exclusion of certain educational institutions from employment dispute resolution mechanisms.