#Dishonest Intent

3 articles

Sort by:

Newest Oldest Top Rated Most Viewed Most Saved Most Discussed

Feb 5, 2026 • 10:29 PM

Anticipatory Bail | Cheque Bounce Cases Require Prima Facie Evidence Of Dishonest Intent : Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan High Court rules that anticipatory bail in cheque bounce cases under Section 138 NI Act requires prima facie evidence of dishonest intent at issuance, not just subsequent dishonour.

Section 420 IPC | Dishonest Intent Must Exist at Inception, Not Later : Bombay High Court

Case Law Analysis

Feb 3, 2026 • 10:04 PM

Section 420 IPC | Dishonest Intent Must Exist at Inception, Not Later : Bombay High Court

Bombay High Court holds that Section 420 IPC requires proof of dishonest intent at the time of deception, not subsequent misappropriation. Key precedent on cheating vs criminal breach of trust.

Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Initiated For Breach Of Commercial Contract | Section 420 IPC Requires Dishonest Intent At Inception : Chhattisgarh High Court

Case Law Analysis

Jan 24, 2026 • 05:27 PM

Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Initiated For Breach Of Commercial Contract | Section 420 IPC Requires Dishonest Intent At Inception : Chhattisgarh High Court

Chhattisgarh High Court quashes criminal complaint under IPC for cheque dishonour, holding that mere breach of contract lacks dishonest intent required for Section 420 IPC.

Stay Updated

Get the latest legal insights delivered to your inbox.

#Dishonest Intent

Anticipatory Bail | Cheque Bounce Cases Require Prima Facie Evidence Of Dishonest Intent : Rajasthan High Court

Section 420 IPC | Dishonest Intent Must Exist at Inception, Not Later : Bombay High Court

Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Initiated For Breach Of Commercial Contract | Section 420 IPC Requires Dishonest Intent At Inception : Chhattisgarh High Court

Categories

Trending Tags

Stay Updated