#Criminal Property

Uttarakhand High Court rules that a vehicle seized in a narcotic case must be released if no prima facie evidence links it to the offence. The court mandated release on a ₹50,000 bond, emphasizing that mere presence at the scene or registration in another jurisdiction does not justify prolonged detention, reinforcing proportionality in property seizures under criminal law.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that prolonged retention of seized vehicles without cause violates justice principles, even under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). Courts must balance investigative needs with property rights, ensuring seized assets are not rendered worthless during pendency. The judgment reinforces the Supreme Court's guidelines in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai, mandating interim custody where depreciation is imminent.

Rajasthan High Court quashes denial of vehicle release on Supurdaginama, affirming Supreme Court's directive that seized vehicles must not be left to deteriorate in police custody.