Topic

criminal intent

4 articlesLatest June 2026
Section 13(1)(d)(ii) PC Act | Failure to Obtain Administrative Sanction + Market Price Fluctuations Do Not Establish Dishonest Intent: Kerala HC
Case Law Analysis
|Kerala High Court

Section 13(1)(d)(ii) PC Act | Failure to Obtain Administrative Sanction + Market Price Fluctuations Do Not Establish Dishonest Intent: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court quashed corruption proceedings against a contractor, holding that absence of administrative sanction and changes in market rates alone cannot prove dishonest intent under the Prevention of Corruption Act. This clarifies that prosecutorial reliance on procedural lapses without evidence of mala fide at the time of agreement violates the core requirement of mens rea under Section 13(1)(d)(ii), protecting contractors from speculative charges.

BNSS Section 482 | Mere Bank Account Sharing Without Knowledge of Fraud Justifies Anticipatory Bail : Allahabad HC
|Allahabad High Court

BNSS Section 482 | Mere Bank Account Sharing Without Knowledge of Fraud Justifies Anticipatory Bail : Allahabad HC

Allahabad HC ruled that sharing a bank account without knowledge of fraudulent activity does not establish criminal intent, granting anticipatory bail. The court emphasized that mere account misuse by a third party, coupled with the applicant's prompt reporting to the bank, negates flight risk or non-cooperation. This sets a precedent for bail in cyber fraud cases where the accused lacks mens rea.