#CPC review jurisdiction

The Chhattisgarh High Court reiterated that a review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is not a platform to reargue factual disputes or challenge evidentiary appreciation already settled in a final judgment. The ruling underscores that review jurisdiction is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record, not rehearing merits.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled that misapplication of a statutory notification under MPLRC Section 165 qualifies as an 'error apparent on the face of record,' allowing review petitions under CPC Order 47. This clarifies the scope of review jurisdiction for lower courts handling property disputes involving tribal land alienation permissions.