Topic

Contractual Fairness

2 articlesLatest May 2026
Article 14 & Public Procurement | Arbitrary Tender Rejection of Lowest Bidder Without Objective Reasons Violates Constitutional Fairness : Chhattisgarh HC Awards Compensation
Case Law Analysis
|Chhattisgarh High Court

Article 14 & Public Procurement | Arbitrary Tender Rejection of Lowest Bidder Without Objective Reasons Violates Constitutional Fairness : Chhattisgarh HC Awards Compensation

Chhattisgarh High Court rules that rejecting the lowest bidder in public procurement without objective justification amounts to arbitrariness under Article 14, entitling the aggrieved party to compensation. The judgment reinforces contractual fairness in government tenders and sets a precedent for challenging capricious tender decisions.

Natural Justice Mandates Pre-Debarment Hearing in E-Auctions | No Automatic Punishment Under RFPs Without Investigating Bid Rigging Allegations : Calcutta HC
Case Law Analysis
|Calcutta High Court

Natural Justice Mandates Pre-Debarment Hearing in E-Auctions | No Automatic Punishment Under RFPs Without Investigating Bid Rigging Allegations : Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court has ruled that even when an RFP permits automatic debarment, authorities cannot blacklist a bidder without first investigating allegations of bid rigging and providing a show-cause notice. This sets a critical precedent for public procurement, ensuring that procedural fairness overrides contractual clauses that circumvent fundamental rights to hearing and fair investigation.