#compensation equality

Punjab & Haryana HC rules that co-sharers in acquired land are entitled to equal compensation as awarded to their co-owners, even if they did not file a Section 18 reference. The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Ramphal v. Haryana SIDC, affirming that execution petitions for equal awards are maintainable. This ensures parity in compensation distribution among co-sharers regardless of procedural participation.

Bombay High Court holds that coordinate benches must grant equal compensation for identical land acquired under same notification, reinforcing consistency in land acquisition awards.