Topic

commercial court jurisdiction

2 articlesLatest July 2026
Section 22(4) Designs Act | Defence Challenging Design Validity Triggers Mandatory High Court Transfer : Kerala HC
Case Law Analysis
|Kerala High Court

Section 22(4) Designs Act | Defence Challenging Design Validity Triggers Mandatory High Court Transfer : Kerala HC

Kerala High Court rules that raising a defence under Section 22(4) of the Designs Act, 2000-challenging the validity of a registered design-automatically transfers the case to the High Court, bypassing lower court jurisdiction. This holding reinforces the exclusive jurisdiction of High Courts in design validity disputes, impacting litigants and practitioners in IP enforcement.

Order VII Rule 10 CPC | Jurisdiction for Share Transfer Suits Lies Where Contract Executed and Shares Situated: Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Order VII Rule 10 CPC | Jurisdiction for Share Transfer Suits Lies Where Contract Executed and Shares Situated: Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court rules that commercial courts have jurisdiction over share transfer disputes if the contract was executed and the shares are situated at the company’s registered office. The decision clarifies that plaintiffs cannot be compelled to file suits in distant courts merely based on defendant’s residence, reinforcing jurisdictional convenience for commercial litigants.