Topic

cheque bounce cases

4 articlesLatest July 2026
Section 148 NI Act | 20% Deposit Condition May Be Reduced to 10% for Petitioners Facing Severe Financial Hardship & Health Crisis: Andhra Pradesh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Andhra Pradesh High Court

Section 148 NI Act | 20% Deposit Condition May Be Reduced to 10% for Petitioners Facing Severe Financial Hardship & Health Crisis: Andhra Pradesh HC

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has ruled that courts may reduce the mandatory 20% deposit under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to 10% when the accused demonstrates compelling financial distress and serious health conditions that impair livelihood. This sets a precedent for judicial discretion in cheque bounce cases, balancing creditor rights with constitutional protections against disproportionate hardship.

Section 528 BNSS | 20% Deposit Requirement in Cheque Bounce Cases May Be Reduced to 10% for Accused with Severe Health & Financial Hardship: AP HC
Case Law Analysis
|Andhra Pradesh High Court

Section 528 BNSS | 20% Deposit Requirement in Cheque Bounce Cases May Be Reduced to 10% for Accused with Severe Health & Financial Hardship: AP HC

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has ruled that courts may reduce the mandatory 20% deposit under Section 528 BNSS to 10% when an accused demonstrates compelling financial distress and serious medical conditions, setting a precedent for equitable relief in non-violent economic offences. This shifts the rigid application of deposit conditions toward proportionality and personal circumstance, benefiting indigent accused in NI Act cases nationwide.

Section 138 NI Act | Compounding Post-Conviction Permissible on Compromise & Compensation : Himachal Pradesh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Himachal Pradesh High Court

Section 138 NI Act | Compounding Post-Conviction Permissible on Compromise & Compensation : Himachal Pradesh HC

Himachal Pradesh High Court reaffirms that offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be compounded even after conviction if parties reach a settlement. The court acquitted the accused upon payment of Rs. 1,72,000 compensation and Rs. 10,000 litigation costs, emphasizing flexibility in dispute resolution for cheque bounce cases.