#cheating

3 articles

Sort by:

Newest Oldest Top Rated Most Viewed Most Saved Most Discussed

Feb 3, 2026 • 10:04 PM

Section 420 IPC | Dishonest Intent Must Exist at Inception, Not Later : Bombay High Court

Bombay High Court holds that Section 420 IPC requires proof of dishonest intent at the time of deception, not subsequent misappropriation. Key precedent on cheating vs criminal breach of trust.

Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Land Disputes | Section 482 CrPC Jurisdiction : Madhya Pradesh High Court

Case Law Analysis

Feb 3, 2026 • 10:04 PM

Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Land Disputes | Section 482 CrPC Jurisdiction : Madhya Pradesh High Court

Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR in land dispute, holding that criminal prosecution cannot substitute civil remedies when allegations lack essential ingredients of forgery or cheating.

Cheating Under Section 418 IPC | Guilty Intent Must Exist At Time Of Promise : High Court Of Jharkhand

Case Law Analysis

Jan 29, 2026 • 06:52 PM

Cheating Under Section 418 IPC | Guilty Intent Must Exist At Time Of Promise : High Court Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court quashes criminal proceedings under Section 418 IPC, holding that mere post-factum failure to deliver land does not constitute cheating without intent at time of promise.

Stay Updated

Get the latest legal insights delivered to your inbox.

#cheating

Section 420 IPC | Dishonest Intent Must Exist at Inception, Not Later : Bombay High Court

Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Land Disputes | Section 482 CrPC Jurisdiction : Madhya Pradesh High Court

Cheating Under Section 418 IPC | Guilty Intent Must Exist At Time Of Promise : High Court Of Jharkhand

Categories

Trending Tags

Stay Updated