Topic

banking fraud

3 articlesLatest 1 week ago
Section 482 CrPC | Bona Fide Legal Opinion by Panel Advocate Cannot Attract IPC Criminal Liability Absent Mala Fide : Patna HC
Case Law Analysis

Section 482 CrPC | Bona Fide Legal Opinion by Panel Advocate Cannot Attract IPC Criminal Liability Absent Mala Fide : Patna HC

Patna HC quashed cognizance against a 35-year panel advocate for UCO Bank, holding that bona fide title opinions on loan properties cannot attract criminal liability under IPC Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 120B absent mala fide or conspiracy. Legal opinions are advisory and non-binding; prosecuting advocates for genuine professional advice strikes at the justice delivery system.

Bank Must Prove Customer Mandate for Mobile Change to Avoid Deficiency of Service : Delhi State CDRC
Case Law Analysis

Bank Must Prove Customer Mandate for Mobile Change to Avoid Deficiency of Service : Delhi State CDRC

The Delhi State Consumer Commission held SBI deficient for not proving the customer authorised the mobile number change that led to ₹42.9 lakh unauthorised withdrawals, ordering refund of that amount plus ₹1 lakh compensation. The ruling clarifies that banks bear the burden of proof for mandate verification, protecting senior customers from fraud due to lax internal controls.

Sections 489-B & 489-C IPC | Mere Possession of Counterfeit Currency Without Proven Mens Rea Insufficient for Conviction : Chhattisgarh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Chhattisgarh High Court

Sections 489-B & 489-C IPC | Mere Possession of Counterfeit Currency Without Proven Mens Rea Insufficient for Conviction : Chhattisgarh HC

Chhattisgarh High Court sets aside conviction under Sections 489-B and 489-C IPC, ruling that possession of counterfeit notes alone does not establish criminal intent unless knowledge or fraudulent purpose is proven. The judgment reinforces the mens rea requirement in counterfeit currency offenses, impacting prosecutions under the IPC.