Topic

Armed Forces Tribunal

4 articlesLatest July 2026
Laches Principle Under Article 226 | 4-Year Delay Without Justification Bars Writ Petition: Kerala HC
Case Law Analysis
|Kerala High Court

Laches Principle Under Article 226 | 4-Year Delay Without Justification Bars Writ Petition: Kerala HC

Kerala High Court dismisses a writ petition challenging a disability pension denial due to a 4-year delay without satisfactory explanation, reinforcing that laches defeats litigation finality under Article 226. The ruling underscores that inordinate delays in approaching constitutional courts can forfeit relief, even in service-related disputes involving fundamental rights.

Section 29(2) Hindu Marriage Act | Customary Divorce Deed Valid for Divorced Daughter’s Family Pension Entitlement : Kerala HC
Case Law Analysis
|Kerala High Court

Section 29(2) Hindu Marriage Act | Customary Divorce Deed Valid for Divorced Daughter’s Family Pension Entitlement : Kerala HC

Kerala High Court rules that a customary divorce deed executed during the parents' lifetime qualifies a divorced daughter for family pension under Section 29(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The judgment clarifies that customary divorces, even if informal, are legally valid for determining pension benefits, impacting service law and family pension claims across Hindu communities.

Territorial Jurisdiction Under AFT Act | Only Delhi HC Can Review Principal Bench Orders : Allahabad HC Upholds Alapan Bandyopadhyay Precedent
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

Territorial Jurisdiction Under AFT Act | Only Delhi HC Can Review Principal Bench Orders : Allahabad HC Upholds Alapan Bandyopadhyay Precedent

Allahabad HC dismisses writ petition challenging an Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) order, ruling that only the Delhi High Court has jurisdiction to review decisions of the AFT's Principal Bench. The court reaffirmed the binding precedent in Alapan Bandyopadhyay, clarifying that territorial jurisdiction for AFT appeals is exclusive to Delhi HC, impacting service members seeking judicial review of discharge or disciplinary orders.