Topic

Abduction

2 articlesLatest March 2026
Section 483 BNSS | Mere Transportation Without Intent or Active Participation Does Not Justify Bail Denial in Abduction Case : Chhattisgarh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Chhattisgarh High Court

Section 483 BNSS | Mere Transportation Without Intent or Active Participation Does Not Justify Bail Denial in Abduction Case : Chhattisgarh HC

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to a cab driver implicated in an abduction, clarifying that passive transportation of accused persons, without evidence of intent, conspiracy, or active role, cannot trigger liability under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. This ruling protects service providers from overbroad criminal liability and reinforces the need for direct culpability in non-bailable offences.

Section 364 IPC | Conviction Without Framed Charge Violates Fair Trial Under Section 222 CrPC: SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Section 364 IPC | Conviction Without Framed Charge Violates Fair Trial Under Section 222 CrPC: SC

The Supreme Court has ruled that convicting an accused under Section 364 IPC without a formal charge, even when evidence supports abduction, breaches fair trial guarantees because the offence is not cognate to Section 302 IPC and cannot be subsumed under Section 222 CrPC. This sets a critical precedent for charge framing precision in criminal trials, protecting accused persons from prejudicial surprise convictions.