#Writ Appeal Maintainability

MP High Court rules that interlocutory orders with final relief implications-such as directions for enquiry or report submission-are appealable under Section 2(1) of the MP Uchcha Nyayalaya Adhiniyam, 2005. The judgment distinguishes between routine interim orders and those affecting substantive rights, reinforcing the right to appellate review for affected parties.

The Karnataka High Court has ruled that refusal to grant prosecution sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act is a sovereign executive decision immune to writ challenges by investigating agencies. This clarifies that only the government, not law enforcement, holds discretionary authority - shielding prosecutorial decisions from procedural interference and reinforcing separation of powers in corruption cases.

Kerala High Court clarifies when writ appeals lie against interim orders passed under Article 226, even if petitions invoke Article 227 jurisdiction. Key principles for SARFAESI Act proceedings.