Topic

Workplace Harassment

3 articlesLatest August 2026
POSH Act coexists with service rules; Voluntary Cessation of Service order cannot penalise harassment complainant | IDBI Bank v. Sharanjeet Kaur : Delhi HC
Case Law Analysis

POSH Act coexists with service rules; Voluntary Cessation of Service order cannot penalise harassment complainant | IDBI Bank v. Sharanjeet Kaur : Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court ruled that the POSH Act does not replace an employer’s service rules and that a Voluntary Cessation of Service order cannot be invoked to retaliate against an employee who files a harassment complaint. This safeguards complainants’ job security and entitles them to back-wages and compensation.

POSH Act | ICC Must Name Known Instigator of False Complaint to Uphold Natural Justice : Bombay HC (Goa)
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

POSH Act | ICC Must Name Known Instigator of False Complaint to Uphold Natural Justice : Bombay HC (Goa)

Bombay High Court at Goa rules that the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) cannot shield the identity of a known instigator of a false sexual harassment complaint under the POSH Act. The court directed the ICC to amend its findings to explicitly name the principal who coerced the complainant, ensuring transparency and accountability in workplace harassment proceedings.

Anticipatory Bail | Extortion Counter-Claims Can Undermine Sexual Offence Allegations in Workplace Cases: SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Anticipatory Bail | Extortion Counter-Claims Can Undermine Sexual Offence Allegations in Workplace Cases: SC

The Supreme Court has ruled that when serious sexual offence allegations are met with credible counter-claims of extortion, anticipatory bail cannot be denied solely on the basis of gravity. This shifts the legal calculus in workplace harassment cases, requiring courts to weigh the credibility of both sides before denying liberty, and sets a new precedent for balancing natural justice against stigmatic accusations.