Topic

value maximization

2 articlesLatest May 2026
IBC Section 29A | Technical Glitch Excluding Bonafide Bidder Vitiates Liquidation Auction; Fresh Sale Mandated with Reserve Price : NCLAT
Case Law Analysis
|National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

IBC Section 29A | Technical Glitch Excluding Bonafide Bidder Vitiates Liquidation Auction; Fresh Sale Mandated with Reserve Price : NCLAT

NCLAT has ruled that a technical failure in the e-auction platform excluding a bonafide bidder undermines the core IBC principle of value maximization, rendering the sale void. The liquidator’s duty to ensure fair, transparent, and non-discriminatory bidding cannot be outsourced to flawed systems - this sets a precedent for all future liquidation auctions under the Code.

'As Is Where Is' Sale Terms Under IBC | NCLAT Bars Post-Auction Bid Enhancements Absent Fraud or Procedural Illegality : NCLAT
Case Law Analysis
|National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

'As Is Where Is' Sale Terms Under IBC | NCLAT Bars Post-Auction Bid Enhancements Absent Fraud or Procedural Illegality : NCLAT

NCLAT reinforces the finality of liquidation auctions under 'as is where is' terms, holding that bidders cannot challenge confirmed sales through post-bid enhancements unless fraud or procedural violations are proven. The ruling protects auction integrity and prevents last-minute bid manipulations, ensuring certainty for liquidators and successful resolution applicants under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.