#Unlawful Activities Prevention Act

The J&K High Court ruled that acting as an intermediary in terror financing and maintaining communication with banned operatives constitutes sufficient grounds for bail denial under the UA(P) Act, even amid trial delays and lack of recovered material. This sets a precedent for stricter bail scrutiny in terror-related offenses involving logistical support roles.

Jharkhand High Court grants bail under the UAPA, ruling that prolonged detention based solely on uncorroborated confessions violates Article 21. The court held mere association with a gang does not prove participation in the offence, setting a precedent for bail jurisprudence under anti-terror laws.