Topic

TDS credit

6 articlesLatest September 2026
Section 270A IT Act | Mere TDS Credit Mismatch Without Intent Constitutes Underreporting, Not Misreporting: ITAT Ahmedabad
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 270A IT Act | Mere TDS Credit Mismatch Without Intent Constitutes Underreporting, Not Misreporting: ITAT Ahmedabad

The ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that discrepancies between Form 26AS TDS credits and declared income, without evidence of intentional concealment, amount to underreporting - not misreporting - under Section 270A. This reduces penalty exposure from 200% to 50%, offering critical relief to businesses with clerical or documentation gaps in commission reporting.

Section 194IA | Inadvertent PAN Error in Form 26QB Does Not Deny TDS Credit When Tax Is Properly Paid : ITAT Ahmedabad
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 194IA | Inadvertent PAN Error in Form 26QB Does Not Deny TDS Credit When Tax Is Properly Paid : ITAT Ahmedabad

When a buyer mistakenly enters their own PAN in the seller’s column on Form 26QB, the ITAT rules that TDS credit cannot be denied if the tax was duly deposited and no double claim exists. This protects purchasers from administrative penalties due to clerical errors, reinforcing that substance must prevail over form in tax compliance.

Section 199 + Rule 37BA | TDS Credit Allowed to Assessee Even When Deducted Under Associate’s PAN, If Income Taxed in Assessee’s Hands : ITAT Delhi
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 199 + Rule 37BA | TDS Credit Allowed to Assessee Even When Deducted Under Associate’s PAN, If Income Taxed in Assessee’s Hands : ITAT Delhi

The ITAT Delhi has ruled that an assessee is entitled to TDS credit even if the tax deduction is reflected under an associate’s PAN, provided the income is genuinely taxed in the assessee’s hands and no double benefit arises. This reinforces the doctrine of substance over form in tax administration, protecting businesses with shared economic structures from unjustified denial of statutory credits.

TDS Credit Mandatory Based on Form 16A Even Without Form 26AS Reflection : ITAT Mumbai Upholds CBDT Circular 5/2013
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

TDS Credit Mandatory Based on Form 16A Even Without Form 26AS Reflection : ITAT Mumbai Upholds CBDT Circular 5/2013

ITAT Mumbai ruled that TDS credit must be granted based on Form 16A issued by a deductor, even if the amount is not reflected in Form 26AS due to non-filing of TDS returns. The decision reinforces CBDT Circular 5/2013, ensuring taxpayers receive credit for taxes deducted at source, regardless of administrative lapses by the deductor.

Section 168 & 199 IT Act | TDS Credit on Post-Death Dividend Income Must Pass to Deceased’s Estate: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 168 & 199 IT Act | TDS Credit on Post-Death Dividend Income Must Pass to Deceased’s Estate: ITAT Mumbai

ITAT Mumbai rules that TDS credit on dividend income accruing after a taxpayer’s death must be allowed to the deceased’s estate, not the legal heir, under Section 168 read with Section 199 of the Income Tax Act. The decision clarifies that the estate is the taxable entity for post-demise income, overriding procedural requirements under Rule 37BA(2) where factual timing of income accrual is established.