Topic

Tax Law & Claims

3 articlesLatest June 2026
Section 147 IT Act | Reassessment Invalid Unless Jurisdictional Belief Is Substantiated by Actual Additions: ITAT Agra
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 147 IT Act | Reassessment Invalid Unless Jurisdictional Belief Is Substantiated by Actual Additions: ITAT Agra

The ITAT Agra has ruled that reassessment under Section 147 is void if the Assessing Officer relies on cash transaction data without verifying the assessee’s explanation or making any actual addition to income. This establishes that mere suspicion or unverified data cannot sustain jurisdictional belief - a critical safeguard for small traders and cash-based businesses facing arbitrary reassessments.

Section 68 Income Tax Act | Opening Balance of Unsecured Loans Cannot Be Added as Unexplained Credit; Burden Shifts to Revenue After Assessee Proves Genuineness : ITAT Delhi
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 68 Income Tax Act | Opening Balance of Unsecured Loans Cannot Be Added as Unexplained Credit; Burden Shifts to Revenue After Assessee Proves Genuineness : ITAT Delhi

The ITAT Delhi has ruled that the opening balance of unsecured loans cannot be treated as unexplained credit under Section 68, even if the closing balance is challenged. Once the assessee establishes the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of lenders, the burden shifts entirely to the Revenue to disprove the transaction - a critical safeguard for charitable trusts and small entities relying on third-party funding.

Section 37(1) IT Act | Double Taxation Barred Even If Same Amount Offered to Tax in Subsequent Year : ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 37(1) IT Act | Double Taxation Barred Even If Same Amount Offered to Tax in Subsequent Year : ITAT Mumbai

ITAT Mumbai rules that while disallowance of commission expenditure under Section 37(1) of the IT Act is valid on merits, the same amount cannot be taxed again in a subsequent assessment year, reinforcing the bar on double taxation. This holding protects taxpayers from punitive reassessments where income was already disclosed and taxed.