Topic

Tax Appeal Procedure

2 articlesLatest July 2026
Section 148A IT Act | Condonation of Delay & Reassessment Validity Require Independent Adjudication : ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 148A IT Act | Condonation of Delay & Reassessment Validity Require Independent Adjudication : ITAT Mumbai

ITAT Mumbai rules that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) must independently adjudicate both the condonation of delay in filing appeals and the validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act. The order sets aside the CIT(A)'s failure to apply this dual-test standard, restoring the appeal for fresh consideration and reinforcing procedural safeguards in tax disputes.

Section 250(6) Income Tax Act | CIT(A) Must Adjudicate Appeals on Merits, Not Dismiss for Non-Prosecution: ITAT Pune
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 250(6) Income Tax Act | CIT(A) Must Adjudicate Appeals on Merits, Not Dismiss for Non-Prosecution: ITAT Pune

ITAT Pune holds that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) cannot dismiss appeals merely for non-prosecution but must adjudicate grounds on merit under Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act. The ruling reinforces the obligation of appellate authorities to ensure substantive justice, impacting taxpayers facing procedural dismissals.