Topic

TADA

2 articlesLatest September 2026
Sovereign Assurance Caps Imprisonment at 25 Years | No Double-Counting of Overlap Custody, Remission Excluded from Life Sentence : SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Sovereign Assurance Caps Imprisonment at 25 Years | No Double-Counting of Overlap Custody, Remission Excluded from Life Sentence : SC

The Supreme Court held that Abu Salem had not served the 25-year limit guaranteed by India’s sovereign assurance to Portugal, barred double-counting of overlapping pre- and post-conviction custody, and clarified that remission earned in jail cannot be added to a life sentence. The ruling affects extradition-based sentences and clarifies how custodial periods and remission are computed for life imprisonment.

Sovereign Assurance Overrides Earned Remission | 25-Year Sentence Cap Under TADA Cannot Be Reduced by Jail Credits : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Sovereign Assurance Overrides Earned Remission | 25-Year Sentence Cap Under TADA Cannot Be Reduced by Jail Credits : Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has ruled that sentences imposed under sovereign assurance - such as Abu Salem’s - are immune to reduction through earned remission, even after 25 years of combined undertrial and post-conviction custody. This sets a binding precedent that sovereign commitments in extradition cases override standard prison incentive systems, affecting future cases involving international cooperation and life sentences under TADA.