Topic

service termination

3 articlesLatest July 2026
Rule 23(f) M.P. Home Guard Rules, 2016 | Termination Invalid If 48-Hour Notification Timeline Commencement Is Unspecified : MP HC Jabalpur
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Rule 23(f) M.P. Home Guard Rules, 2016 | Termination Invalid If 48-Hour Notification Timeline Commencement Is Unspecified : MP HC Jabalpur

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that terminating a Home Guard for failing to report a criminal case within 48 hours is unlawful when the rule fails to define when the clock starts-whether upon registration, charge sheet filing, or notice receipt. This ruling reinforces procedural fairness in service law by requiring clear, actionable timelines in statutory obligations affecting livelihoods.

Compassionate Appointment | Failure in CPC T Exam Requires Alternative Class III/IV Posting, Not Termination : MP HC Jabalpur
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Compassionate Appointment | Failure in CPC T Exam Requires Alternative Class III/IV Posting, Not Termination : MP HC Jabalpur

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that terminating a compassionate appointee for failing the CPC T exam violates proportionality and legitimate expectation. Authorities must explore suitable alternative Class III or IV posts where such certification is not mandatory, ensuring compassionate appointments retain their humanitarian purpose without punitive rigidity.