#service appointment

Bombay High Court rules that an unsuccessful candidate in a recruitment process has no legal standing to challenge the appointment of another candidate unless they demonstrate a personal legal right or public duty violation. The court dismissed the writ petition, reinforcing that mere eligibility does not confer locus standi to seek replacement of the appointed candidate.

Madhya Pradesh High Court rules that termination of service based on an FIR lodged after appointment violates principles of natural justice unless a proper inquiry establishes guilt. The court reinstated the petitioner with full arrears, emphasizing that mere registration of an FIR does not constitute valid grounds for arbitrary dismissal under public employment law.