
Case Law Analysis
|Madras High Court
Section 67 CGST Act | Seizure of Digital Evidence Must Not Hinder Summons Compliance: Madras HC Directs Return of Seized Computer
Madras High Court rules that GST authorities cannot retain seized electronic devices if their possession prevents taxpayers from complying with summons, reinforcing that seizure powers must balance investigative needs with statutory rights. The judgment mandates the return of the computer to enable the petitioner to furnish supplier lists, bank statements, and other summoned documents, setting a precedent for proportionality in digital evidence seizures under tax law.