#Section 92

Madhya Pradesh High Court rules that recovery proceedings under Section 92 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Act are legally invalid unless Section 89 proceedings are fully completed. The court stayed coercive action, reinforcing the principle of natural justice in administrative recoveries affecting public bodies and individuals.

The Meghalaya High Court ruled that a landlord listed as 'C/o' in company records cannot be held liable under Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013, for non-compliance by the company. Liability requires functional responsibility, not mere administrative registration. This clarifies that property ownership alone does not attract regulatory penalties under corporate law.

Kerala High Court holds that repairing three-wheelers with 10+ workers using power qualifies as manufacturing under Section 2(k) of the Factories Act, 1948, triggering statutory obligations.