Topic

Section 397

2 articlesLatest May 2026
Deemed Membership Under Sections 397-398 | No Register Entry Bar to Oppression Remedy if Proprietary Interest Proven : SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Deemed Membership Under Sections 397-398 | No Register Entry Bar to Oppression Remedy if Proprietary Interest Proven : SC

The Supreme Court ruled that a person can qualify as a deemed member under Sections 397-398 of the Companies Act, 1956, even without formal registration, if their financial contribution and the company’s conduct demonstrate a proprietary interest. This expands access to equitable remedies for investors and stakeholders whose rights are ignored through technical non-registration.

Section 397-398 Companies Act | Estoppel Bars Oppression Claim If Party Consents to Share Allotment : NCLAT
Case Law Analysis
|National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Section 397-398 Companies Act | Estoppel Bars Oppression Claim If Party Consents to Share Allotment : NCLAT

NCLAT rules that shareholders who actively consent to private placements or share sales cannot later challenge the same transactions as oppressive under Sections 397-398 of the Companies Act, 1956. The judgment reinforces estoppel as a bar to oppression claims where parties have knowingly participated in the impugned transactions.