Topic

Section 28 Customs Act

2 articlesLatest May 2026
Section 112(a) Customs Act | Consistent Past Classification Acceptance Bars Extended Period Duty Demand: CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Section 112(a) Customs Act | Consistent Past Classification Acceptance Bars Extended Period Duty Demand: CESTAT Chennai

CESTAT Chennai rules that when customs authorities have consistently accepted a tariff classification over years, the department cannot later allege suppression to extend the limitation period for duty demand. This protects importers and logistics firms from retrospective penalties when classifications were openly and repeatedly approved, reinforcing legal certainty in trade compliance.

EODC is Conclusive Proof of Export Obligation Fulfilment Under FTP Schemes: CESTAT Kolkata Quashes ₹14.97 Crore Demand | Customs Law
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

EODC is Conclusive Proof of Export Obligation Fulfilment Under FTP Schemes: CESTAT Kolkata Quashes ₹14.97 Crore Demand | Customs Law

CESTAT Kolkata holds that Export Obligation Discharge Certificates (EODCs) issued by DGFT are binding and conclusive evidence of export obligation fulfilment under FTP schemes. The ruling sets aside a ₹14.97 crore customs demand, reinforcing legal certainty for exporters and importers relying on DGFT authorisations.